The view that there is a morally relevant distinction between the intended consequences of an action and their unintended (even if foreseeable) consequences. This allows greater scope for ethical action for those who posit exceptionless moral principles, but it is rejected by those who judge actions entirely on their consequences. It is a view that it is never acceptable to perform a bad action, even if it produces a good effect. It may, however, sometimes be acceptable to perform a good action, even if it produces a bad effect.
Trending Post
Books
- Discipline Is Destiny: The Power of Self-Control (The Stoic Virtues Series) $15.99
- Stillness Is the Key $7.99
- Right Thing, Right Now: Justice in an Unjust World (The Stoic Virtues Series) $28.00
- How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius $13.12
- Letters from a Stoic: Penguin Classics $14.52
biographies
- Zeno of Elea December 3, 2023
- Zeno of Citium December 3, 2023
- Xenophanes December 3, 2023
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig December 3, 2023
- Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet) December 3, 2023
- Venn, John December 3, 2023
- Turing, Alan Mathison December 3, 2023
- Thoreau, Henry David December 3, 2023
- Thales of Miletus December 3, 2023
- Spinoza, Baruch December 3, 2023
- Socrates December 3, 2023
- Smith, Adam December 3, 2023
- Seneca December 3, 2023
- Schopenhauer, Arthur December 3, 2023
- Schleiermacher, Friedrich December 3, 2023